Of course ACA wouldn't know objective journalism if it bit them on the arse. They did the usual: All these people agreed with us, here's a sample of the most vitriolic (and my spelling probably sucks); there were people who agreed with the Bitch, but we won't mention anything they said, just in case it makes our viewers think and consider another point of view.
I really wonder why we bother sometimes. Though interestingly, the your say on The Age about it had probably close to 50% agreeing with Germaine, though some thought her timing was off. And those posts mostly had better spelling and grammar.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
dancing_serpent
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-07 11:09 pm (UTC)Of course ACA wouldn't know objective journalism if it bit them on the arse. They did the usual: All these people agreed with us, here's a sample of the most vitriolic (and my spelling probably sucks); there were people who agreed with the Bitch, but we won't mention anything they said, just in case it makes our viewers think and consider another point of view.
I really wonder why we bother sometimes. Though interestingly, the your say on The Age about it had probably close to 50% agreeing with Germaine, though some thought her timing was off. And those posts mostly had better spelling and grammar.